Rejecting the bail plea of a militant convicted in the 1996 Lajpat Nagar blast case, the Supreme Court on Monday said it would be better for those involved in the killing of innocents to forget their families.
A bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar denied permission for interim bail to alleged Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Front (JKIF) militant Mohammad Naushad, who wanted to attend his daughter's marriage on 28 February.
"If someone is involved in a heinous offence of indiscriminate killing of innocents, then it's better he forgets his family ties. No parole or interim bail should be granted to them to attend any family exigencies," the bench, also comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, said.
Naushad, in his plea, had contended that he has been in jail for the past two decades and wanted to attend his daughter's marriage.
JKIF terrorists had triggered explosives kept in a stolen Maruti car setting off a high intensity blast in the Lajpat Nagar market on 21 May, 1996, claiming 12 lives.
A Delhi court had in April 2010 convicted six alleged JKIF militants, awarding death sentence to Naushad, Mohd Ali Bhat alias Kille and Mirza Nissar Hussain, while their fourth accomplice Javed Ahmad Khan alias Chotta Javed was sentenced to life imprisonment.
The High Court had however commuted Naushad's death sentence to life term and acquitted Hussain and Bhat, who were given capital punishment by the trial court. It had upheld the life sentence given to convict Javed Ahmad Khan, while slamming police for "serious lapses" in probe.
The High Court had rebuked the Delhi Police for its failure to adduce even "the minimum standard of proof" and said "it has shown a casual approach in the case".
The trial court had sentenced two other convicts, Farooq Ahmed Khan and his woman accomplice Farida Dar, who had been held guilty for offences under the Explosive Substances Act and the Arms Act, to imprisonment for seven years and four years and two months respectively.
Here's how Twitter reacted to the news:
When Hindutva mass murderers are barely prosecuted and many "terrorist" cases are false, SC's language is dangerous https://t.co/iRHfLeUnyx— Shankar G (@ShankarGopalak) February 21, 2017
Pragya Thakur & Purohit's pending bail order, being argued at Bombay HC, should be cancelled. & Bajrangi & Kodnani? https://t.co/HKq23JJuom— Gaurav Pandhi (@GauravPandhi) February 21, 2017
Very Good judgement 👇👇Terrorists killing innocents won’t get bail, parole, says Supreme Court https://t.co/N0kr8VbtRS— Sweta_Entomon (@sp_dash68) February 21, 2017
https://t.co/7bttMtKxfd— Aaditya Paralkar (@aadi9477) February 21, 2017
(Feature image source: PTI)