The BJD leader claims his campaign is aimed at decriminalising defamation and for reforms in defamation laws or India, based on consultation. The ultimate result is to draft a bill that Satpathy says would protect both freedom of speech and reputation, instead of balancing the two aspects out against each other as our existing laws currently do. 

Here are some excerpts from Satpathy’s message to the people on Speechbill: 

• “Our idea is to create a mechanism for just, speedy and effective implementation of a law against defamation, while safeguarding our cherished right to free speech, creating a model law that I can present to the Parliament as a Private Member’s Bill. 
• “If we look around the world, there is an emerging global trend to abolish criminal defamation. .. India must march in tandem with the world and make an effort to keep up with times.”

• “Criminal defamation is a law made in 1860 and preserved without substantial legislative change till date. This was created by a foreign power with open intentions to curb liberty of a subject nation.”
• “What may have been reasonable in medieval England and colonial India is clearly not suited to a modern, democratic society that values free discussion and debate.” 

He also lays down 10 principles that are to be followed to successfully draft the new #Speechbill as the website refers to it. Speechbill tweeted a picture containing a broad gist of the guidelines: 

Netizens are urged to forward their views and comments on the 10 principles to the website in order to create the draft of the minister’s bill which he intends to present in Parliament. According to the website,

“The #SpeechBill is a public consultation,” 

Tathagata Sathpathy, the MP from Odisha and the editor of Oriya magazine Dhariti, has been a staunch supporter of unfettered free speech, making headlines several times, with his many defamation cases and his public support of and admittance to recreational marijuana use. (He admitted to having smoked pot in college). He even wore a hemp kurta to Parliament once.

The issue of the legality of the tenets upheld by India’s current defamation laws came when BJP leader Subramaniyam Swamy contested them earlier in the year in Swamy vs Union of India. The bid was later joined by Congress’s Rahul Gandhi and AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal. 

India’s defamation laws and laws ensuring freedom of speech are in fact a little blurry on the edges with no clear separation among the two. 

For example, Section 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code criminalises defamation with imprisonment of up to two years. On the other hand, Section 19 (1) of the Constitution ensures freedom of speech to every citizen. Satpathy says that the current law, which strives to protect speech but not at the cost of someone’s ‘reputation’, is one used by colonial rulers to sway judgements and repress dissent. 

The Supreme Court, however, upheld in May that even if dissent is required, it does not grant one an unfettered right to damage another’s reputation. 

Feature Image Source: PTI