White House press secretary Sean Spicer apologized Tuesday for “insensitive” remarks in which he seemed to favorably compare Adolf Hitler’s actions during the Holocaust to atrocities carried out now by strongman Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
During a White House briefing Spicer sought to intensify criticism of Assad, painting the Syrian leader’s suspected use of sarin nerve agent against civilians last week as historically evil.
“You had someone as despicable as Hitler who didn’t even sink to using chemical weapons,” the spokesman said during a White House press briefing, momentarily forgetting the Holocaust and prompting outraged calls for his resignation.
A few hours later, a contrite Spicer appeared on US television expressing regret for the comments, which in the hours after he made them were greeting with growing outrage and demands for his resignation.
“Frankly, I mistakenly used an inappropriate and insensitive comment about the Holocaust and there is no comparison,” he told CNN.
“For that I apologize. It was a mistake to do that.”
Spicer’s comments, which came during the Jewish festival of Passover, sparked calls from anti-defamation groups and opposition Democrats for his ouster.
“Sean Spicer must be fired, and the President must immediately disavow his spokesman’s statements,” said top congressional Democrat Nancy Pelosi.
“Either he is speaking for the president, or the president should have known better than to hire him.”
Spicer — the most public face of the Donald Trump’s administration after the president himself — has been a frequent target of ire and satirists for his angry denunciations of press coverage and sometimes loose grasp of the facts.
He was pilloried for his first appearance in the press briefing room in January, when he browbeat journalists and falsely insisted Trump had the biggest inaugural audience ever.
He later caused an international incident by claiming British signals intelligence agency GCHQ helped former president Barack Obama spy on Trump.
Furious British spies described the claim as “nonsense” and “utterly ridiculous,” forcing Spicer to explain his comments to the British ambassador.
But his latest claim brought anger from across the political spectrum and looks of astonishment from the assembled White House press corps, who offered Spicer a chance to clarify.
“I think when you come to sarin gas, there was no — he was not using the gas on his own people the same way that Assad is doing,” Spicer said, returning to the subject.
As journalists shouted “what about the Holocaust?” Spicer continued, “I think there is clearly… I understand the point, thank you, thank you I appreciate that.”
Hitler “brought them into the Holocaust centers, I understand that. But I’m saying in the way that Assad used them, where he went into towns, dropped them down, to innocent — into the middle of towns, it was brought… so the use of it, I appreciate the clarification, that was not the intent.”
Steven Goldstein, head of the Anne Frank Center, described Spicer’s comments as an “evil slur” and said he now “lacks the integrity to serve.”
In an earlier written clarification, Spicer said he was “in no way… trying to lessen the horrendous nature of the Holocaust.”
“I was trying to draw a distinction of the tactic of using airplanes to drop chemical weapons on population centers. Any attack on innocent people is reprehensible and inexcusable,” he explained.
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis later offered a hint at what Spicer may have meant, saying that “even in World War II, chemical weapons were not used on battlefields.”
“Since World War I, there has been an international convention on this.”
Richard Price, professor of political science at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver and author of The Chemical Weapons Taboo told AFP Hitler in fact came very close to using chemical weapons on civilian areas.
“Hitler used gas widely in the concentration camps, but they never used them against soldiers nor against cities,” he said.
“Albert Speer, munitions minister, said that during the trials of Nuremberg that Hitler gave the order to use them in the last months of the war, but his generals refused, because they knew the war was over, there was no point.”
(Feature image source: Reuters)